Skip to main content

Concept paper on improving the OPTN UNOS committee structure

Proposal Overview

Status: Public Comment

Sponsoring Committee: Executive Committee

Strategic Goal 5: Promote the efficient management of the OPTN

Use this form to provide your feedback to this concept paper. This is part of a trial to study potential enhancements to the public comment process. Your comments relating to the proposal (and your name, if supplied) will be displayed in the comment section below.

Read the full concept paper (PDF - 732 K; 1/2018)

In June 2016, the OPTN/UNOS Executive Committee endorsed formation of a two-year workgroup (“committee governance workgroup”) to assess the OPTN/UNOS committee governance structure; possible improvements to committee recruitment, selection, and engagement; and how to improve committee alignment with the Board of Directors. After endorsing several new changes to improve the committee recruitment process, the Executive Committee is considering a new concept recommended by the committee governance workgroup with regard to improving the committee governance structure.

The committee governance workgroup identified the current “one size fits all” structure as needing improvement because it limits opportunity for broader transplant community participation and makes it difficult to incorporate diverse perspectives on committees. In addition, the structure and current methods for collecting public comment from committees, regions, societies, and the general public does not allow the Board of Directors to fully consider the sentiment of particular groups or communities when making policy decisions, as perspectives are offered sporadically throughout the system. In this document, the Executive Committee outlines a proposed new volunteer workforce structure and requests feedback on whether this new concept better incorporates perspectives of different important constituencies (patient, living donor, donor family, transplant professionals), while also maintaining the subject matter expertise.

Contact: Casey Humphries

Use this form to provide your feedback to this concept paper. This is part of a trial to study potential enhancements to the public comment process. Your comments relating to the proposal (and your name, if supplied) will be displayed in the comment section below.

We review all comments before they are posted. It may take up to 24 hours from the time you submit the comment for it to appear on the website.

IMPORTANT RULES ABOUT COMMENTING

To maintain a respectful dialogue, please review the OPTN Standards for Public Comment and also follow the guidelines below that were adapted from the HHS Comment Policy. Comments that violate these rules will not be published.

  • Stay focused. All viewpoints are welcome but comments should remain relevant to the specific proposal being addressed.
  • Be respectful. Personal attacks, profanity, and aggressive behavior are prohibited. Instigating arguments in a disrespectful way is also prohibited.
  • No spam. Repeated posting of identical or very similar content in a counter-productive manner is prohibited — this includes posts aggressively promoting services or products.
Use this form to provide your feedback to this concept paper. This is part of a trial to study potential enhancements to the public comment process. Your comments relating to the proposal (and your name, if supplied) will be displayed in the comment section below.